home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: portland.caps.maine.edu!dseama41
- Organization: University of Maine System
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 16:15:53 EST
- From: Starduster <DSEAMA41@portland.caps.maine.edu>
- Message-ID: <96026.161553DSEAMA41@portland.caps.maine.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: BORLAND C++ 4.5 wont add .1 and .9
- References: <corekinDLG8t4.3C5@netcom.com>
- <4e5njv$e9v@damon.irf.uni-dortmund.de> <4e8e80$jdc@linet02.li.net>
- <4eaf69$4oj@damon.irf.uni-dortmund.de>
-
- In article <4eaf69$4oj@damon.irf.uni-dortmund.de>,
- rothert@damon.irf.uni-dortmund.de (Bernd Rothert) says:
- >
- >It's the ? operator as you can see in the assembler source (bcc -B onetwo.c):
-
-
- I got the same supposedly incorrect results with Borland C++ 4.0. However,
- with Turbo C++ 3.0 for DOS I did get the expected result of 2. DJGPP also
- produced 2. Haven't tried it with Microsoft compilers yet. Interesting....
-